NOTE

The following summary of S. 510 reflects the manager’s amendment, as released
by the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on August 12, 2010.
 

Summary and Background 

During the week of November 15th, the Senate may consider S. 510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. The Senate’s consideration of this legislation has been preceded by over a year of bipartisan work from, among others, Senators Durbin, Harkin, Dodd, Alexander, Burr, Gregg, and the late Senator Kennedy

This bipartisan legislation would overhaul our current food safety system, which has failed to protect far too many Americans and will continue to fail them unless Congress improves the nation’s food safety laws. The legislation would address a number of the weaknesses of the current system by, among other provisions: 

 

Major Provisions

Title I—Improving Capacity to Prevent Food Safety Problems 

Section 101—inspection of records. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would give the FDA expanded access to food facility records (excluding farms and restaurants) if: 

Section 102—registration of food facilities. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would expand current registration requirements for food facilities by: 

Section 103—hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require: 

Section 104—performance standards. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA, not less than every two years, to: 

 

Section 105—standards for produce safety. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would give the FDA authority to: 

 

Section 106—intentional adulteration. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA, working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA), to: 

 

Section 107—authority to collect fees. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would: 

The legislation would also require appropriated funding to keep pace in order for fees to be collected.

 

Section 108—national agriculture and food defense strategy. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require HHS and USDA, in consultations with DHS, to: 

 

Section 109—food and agriculture coordinating councils. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require DHS, in consultation with HHS and USDA, to: 

 

Section 110—building domestic food safety capacity. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act requires a series of reports and actions intended to focus FDA's attention on several challenges, including: 

 

Section 111—sanitary transportation of food. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA to: 

 

Section 112—food allergy and anaphylaxis management in children. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act directs HHS, in consultation with the Department of Education, to develop voluntary food allergy management guidelines to manage the risk of food allergy and anaphylaxis in schools or early childhood education programs. The legislation would also provide for non-renewable food allergy management incentive grants for up to two years to assist local educational agencies (LEAs) with adoption and implementation of the voluntary food allergy management guidelines.

 

Section 113—new dietary ingredients. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA to: 

 

Section 114—post harvest processing of raw oysters. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA to: 

 

Section 115—port shopping. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require that until FDA publishes its final rule on the marking of food imports that are refused entry into the United States (as required by the Bioterrorism Act) that the FDA: 

 

Section 116—alcohol-related facilities. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act would require the FDA to: 

 

Title II: Improving Capacity to Prevent Food Safety Problems

Section 201—targeting inspection resources. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Actwould require the FDA to: 

 

Section 202—laboratory accreditation. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act woulddirect the FDA to: 

 

Section 203—integrated consortium of laboratory networks. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require DHS to work with HHS, Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to effectively integrate laboratory networks and other relevant data sources to optimize national preparedness by: 

 

Section 204—enhancing tracebackand recordkeeping. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require the FDA, in coordination with the produce industry, to: 

 

Section 205—pilot project to enhance tracebackand recordkeeping with respect to processed food. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require the Secretary of HHS to establish a pilot project to:

 

 

Section 206—surveillance. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would: 

 

Section 207—mandatory recall authority. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would give the FDA Commissioner the authority to: 

 

 

Section 208—administrative detention. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would allow the FDA to: 

 

Section 209—decontamination and disposal standards and plans. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require the EPA, in coordination with HHS, DHS, and USDA, to: 

 

Section 210—training of state, local, territorial and tribal food safety officials. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require the Secretary to: 

This training relates to the regulatory responsibilities and other policies established by this legislation.

 

Section 211—grants to enhance food safety. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would authorize the Department of Health and Human Services to: 

 

Title III: Improving the Safety of Imported Food

 Section 301—foreign supplier verification program. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require importers to: 

Importers of seafood, juice, and low-acid canned food that comply with existing regulations would be deemed to be in compliance with this section.

 

Section 302—voluntary qualified importer program. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would allow importers to qualify for expedited review and importation of food if: 

 

Section 303—authority to require import certifications for food. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would allow the FDA to: 

The legislation also includes a provision which states that FDA may refuse admission of a food import lacking required certification.

 

Section 304—prior notice of imported food shipments. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require: 

 

Section 305—building capacity of foreign governments with respect to food. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Actwould require the FDA to: 

 

Section 306—inspection of foreign food facilities. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Actwould allow the FDA to: 

Section 307—accreditation of third-party auditors and audit agents. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would direct the FDA to: 

 

Section 308—foreign offices of the FDA. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would direct the FDA to: 

 

Section 309—smuggled food. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would require the Secretary of HHS to consult with the Secretary of DHS, Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, and the Assistant Secretary for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to: 

 

Title IV: Miscellaneous Provisions

Section 401—funding for food safety. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would: 

 

Section 402—whistleblower protections. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would prohibit retaliation by manufacturers, processors, packagers, transporters, distributers, receivers, holders, or importers against their employees who have, in relation to potential or real food safety violations, provided: 

 

Section 403—jurisdiction. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act would clarify that: 

 

Section 404—compliance with international agreements. The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act stipulates that: 

 

Legislative History 

On March 3, 2009, S. 510 was introduced by Senator Durbinand the bill was referred to the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. When introduced, the bill enjoyed bipartisan support and six original cosponsors: Senators Dodd, Kennedy, Alexander, Burr, Gregg, and Isakson. 

On November 18, 2009, the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee approved the legislation by voice vote. 

On December 18, 2009, the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee reported the legislation to the Senate floor with an amendment. When placed on the Senate calendar, the legislation had garnered further bipartisan support with nine additional cosponsors: Senators Bingaman,Burris, Gillibrand, Harkin, Klobuchar, Udall (NM), Chambliss, Enzi, and Hatch. 

The Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee released a Manager’s Amendment to S. 510on August 12, 2010.

 

Expected Amendments 

The DPC will distribute information on amendments as it becomes available to staff listservs.

 

Administration Position 

At the time of publication, the Administration had not released a Statement of Administration Policy on S. 510.